exdirectivo of Osasuna Txuma Peralta made about 5,400 sports betting while he was director of Osasuna thanks to the money he received in cash by the club, about 65,000 euros .
In a report made by the Group of Economic Crime and Organized Crime of the National Police and has been referred to the court investigating the case it determined that Peralta took place bets mainly on the modalities of tennis and football, some of between 1,500 and 2,500 euros.
Peralta lost in 2013 some 41,000 euros, 24,000 euros while others were left in 2014 , virtually all the money they had given Osasuna in black on different concepts.
However, far from being a mere risk and uncontrolled waste of money, the police points to bet on matches Peralta allegedly rigged Osasuna on investigating judge.
Peralta bet 800 euros to Sevilla Osasuna won in the 2012-2013 season and won a prize of 1,920 euros .
He also bet 1,500 euros to Osasuna got the win against Betis (2013-2014 season), so he got 2,100 euros prize .
In addition, in 2014 he made another 8 simple betting games between Osasuna and other equipment, but in the match Betis allegedly bought by the directive Osasuna in the most money won.
As players investigated all teams involved in the possible intrigues, police have not found significant bets. The wife of Jordi Figueras itself made some parlay with several parties, but without great prizes. Only one of his bets won 184 euros .
A manager Estella farms has been sentenced to 6 months imprisonment and a fine of 1,200 euros for appropriating 16385 euros from neighbors that managed the accounts of their community.
In addition, he may not exercise the job of administrator of estates during the time of the custodial sentence of freedom, which has been at the expense of do not commit more crimes in the next two years .
The ruling, issued in accordance , can not be appealed. The prosecutor, at first, requested 5 years in prison and a fine of 3,000 euros.
Prior to the trial, the accused has already admitted 5,249 euros of 16385 to be returned.
The woman began working for a community of Calle Maria de Maeztu Estella in 2002. ” During the early years, successfully played their professional duties , ” said the statement, to explain how the confidence of the neighbors won.
“Relying on its professional credibility, between 2007 and 2010 the accused did not arouse suspicion while he was appropriating their advantage of various amounts of the community.”
He did it with transfers by non – existent or undue debts , either by reintegrating large amounts bearer checks.
Thus, the manager was getting money discretely , each year a different amount in different remittances, until the neighbors realized what had happened.